Ben, Thank you very much for your on-spot review. I agree with your comments. And thank you Akbar for starting to address Ben’s questions.
I have also reviewed the draft, and observe that a few other ADs have raised the Informational classification as an issue as well. One of the suggested ways out of the issue is to re-classify the document as Experimental. Perhaps that might be a way forward, while being able to retain some of the protocol definitions/extensions that this document does. I will not hold a Discuss on this document, because other ADs already do. However, I have a number of my own comments that you may consider if you find them useful. I’ll send them shortly. Jari
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
