Is there a response to this? It seems important that the ranges are correct.
Jari On 24 Nov 2014, at 09:21, Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazip...@ericsson.com> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at < > http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a > new version of the draft. > Document: draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-mldp-nlri-07 > Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour > Review Date: 2014-11-24 > IETF LC End Date: 2014-10-27 > IESG Telechat date: 2014-11-25 > > Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I > have some comments . > > Minor issue: > -> > page [Page 8]: > " > - Range 0x41-0x7f: mLDP Range. Values are assigned from this range > when the NLRI format associated with the route type presupposes > that mLDP is the C-multicast control protocol. > > " > > Should it be should it be Range 0x43-0x7f ? since 0x40-0x42 is Reserved. > > > Nits: > -> > Please see LC message as well: > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/current/msg10805.html > > > Best Regards, > Meral > --- > Meral Shirazipour > Ericsson > Research > www.ericsson.com > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
