Hi Brian, Thanks for your review (apologies for the delay from my side). Response i-line [Uma]:
-- Uma C. -----Original Message----- From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 7:37 PM To: draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis....@ietf.org; General Area Review Team Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis-04 I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis-04.txt Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review Date: 2015-06-13 IETF LC End Date: 2015-07-03 IESG Telechat date: Summary: Almost ready -------- Minor Issue: ------------ > 3.2. Key Management Protocols I don't like the references to expired drafts. These drafts almost have the flavour of normative references, since apparently they described recommended mitigation techniques. If they matter, they should be properly available. draft-weis-gdoi-mac-tek-03 draft-yeung-g-ikev2-08 draft-hartman-karp-mrkmp-05 [Uma]: Sure. But to give a bit context quickly - KARP WG started working on group keying protocol based on IKEv2 when I used these references. But, later scope is changed and this aspect didn't go forward as expected. So I would remove the references to draft-yeung-g-ikev2-08 and draft-hartman-karp-mrkmp-05. However, though expired, I would like to keep the reference for draft-weis-gdoi-mac-tek-03 and associated RFC 6407, so in future it can present a good reference to GDOI in this context. Hope this is acceptable else I shall remove this too. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
