Hi Brian, Thanks for your consideration and for providing the modified text quickly. That works and it's a great help. Shall update this in the next version. -- Uma C.
-----Original Message----- From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 1:32 PM To: Uma Chunduri; draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis....@ietf.org; General Area Review Team Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis-04 Hi Uma, See below... On 30/06/2015 06:19, Uma Chunduri wrote: > Hi Brian, > > Thanks for your review (apologies for the delay from my side). > Response i-line [Uma]: > > -- > Uma C. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 7:37 PM > To: draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis....@ietf.org; General Area Review > Team > Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis-04 > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may > receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-karp-isis-analysis-04.txt > Reviewer: Brian Carpenter > Review Date: 2015-06-13 > IETF LC End Date: 2015-07-03 > IESG Telechat date: > > Summary: Almost ready > -------- > > Minor Issue: > ------------ > >> 3.2. Key Management Protocols > > I don't like the references to expired drafts. These drafts almost have the > flavour of normative references, since apparently they described recommended > mitigation techniques. If they matter, they should be properly available. > draft-weis-gdoi-mac-tek-03 > draft-yeung-g-ikev2-08 > draft-hartman-karp-mrkmp-05 > > [Uma]: Sure. But to give a bit context quickly - > > KARP WG started working on group keying protocol based on IKEv2 when I used > these references. But, later scope is changed and this aspect didn't go > forward as expected. > So I would remove the references to draft-yeung-g-ikev2-08 and > draft-hartman-karp-mrkmp-05. However, though expired, I would like to > keep the reference for > draft-weis-gdoi-mac-tek-03 and associated RFC 6407, so in future it can > present a good reference to GDOI in this context. Hope this is acceptable > else I shall remove this too. Thanks for the answer. I am still a bit concerned that a reader will be slightly confused, though. Can I suggest trying to rephrase the sentence a bit, something like: OLD: A mechanism, similar to as described in [I-D.weis-gdoi-mac-tek] can be used to distribute group keys to a group of ISes in Level-1 area or Level-2 domain, using GDOI as specified in [RFC6407]. NEW: A mechanism is needed to distribute group keys to a group of ISes in a Level-1 area or Level-2 domain, using the Group Domain of Interpretation (GDOI) protocol as specified in [RFC6407]. An example policy and payload format was described in [I-D.weis-gdoi-mac-tek]. Regards Brian _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
