Hi Brian, hi Jari, I’ve put updating Martin’s affliction incl. email address as well as removing the conclusion already in the RFC editor (in case we don’t do another update before publication).
I note your concerns about the references to individual drafst, however, not sure how this fix this. Thanks! Mirja > Am 30.06.2016 um 00:19 schrieb Jari Arkko <jari.ar...@piuha.net>: > > Thanks much, Brian! > > Authors, do note Brian’s comments. > > Jari > > On 24 Jun 2016, at 05:48, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your >> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. >> >> For more information, please see the FAQ at >> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-alto-deployments-15.txt >> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter >> Review Date: 2016-06-13 >> IETF LC End Date: 2016-06-21 >> IESG Telechat date: 2016-06-30 >> >> Summary: Ready >> -------- >> >> Comment: >> -------- >> >> This is a long document but well written, so there is little to say about it. >> >> Minor issues: >> ------------- >> >> The Conclusion section could be deleted. It doesn't add anything. >> >> There are a lot of Informational references that are still personal I-Ds. >> Many of >> them are not even listed as "Related Internet-Drafts" for the Alto WG. I >> think readers >> of the future RFC will find this a bit annoying. >> >> Nits: >> ----- >> >> <jan.seed...@neclab.eu> and <martin.stiemerl...@neclab.eu> bounced >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gen-art mailing list >> Gen-art@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
