On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Alissa Cooper <ali...@cooperw.in> wrote:
> > > On Jan 29, 2018, at 1:12 PM, Pete Resnick <presn...@qti.qualcomm.com> > wrote: > > > > > >> 8. Section 4: > >> > >> 'It is anticipated that > >> those roles will evolve. The IASA is responsible for keeping the > >> community informed in this regard, and MAY do so without updating > >> this memo.' > >> > >> I would be a little concerned if some of the key roles would change > without > >> this document being updated. I understand the need to be flexible, but > we need > >> to put some limits. Maybe at least emphasize the need to inform the > community > >> by a MUST. For example: > >> > >> 'It is anticipated that > >> those roles will evolve. The IASA MUST keep the > >> community informed in this regard, and MAY do so without updating > >> this memo.' > > > > I don't think the MUST significantly changes the meaning, so I'm > ambivalent about the change. Since this text was put in to address a > comment in AD Evaluation, I'm inclined to hear from Alissa. > > Perhaps the concern could be addressed by saying “without first updating > this memo”? The point I raised is that this document shouldn’t gate the > ability for the roles to change, but certainly if they do change the > document should be updated (or obsoleted by a new document) to match the > reality. > > Thanks, > Alissa That would be fine with me. Regards, Dan
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
