Dear Joel,

Thank you very much for your kind review.

> Nits/editorial comments:
>    In section 2.2, in talking about "metric M", if I have understood properly,
>    I think it would be clearer if you referred to "metric value M".

This section has been expanded with human-readable text and a reference to
a research paper, and should therefore now be easier to understand.
I have, however, decided to follow the usual style of mathematical
writing, and have therefore chosen not to follow your advice.  I hope that
is okay.

Thanks again,

-- Juliusz

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to