I do not consider this a show-stopper (I listed it as a nit /
editorial), but at least the -07 text does not look better in this regard.
In my experience, if this were indeed mathematics, one would talk about
a metric (how one measures) and a distance (the result of applying the
measure. E.g. Given two points in a metric space, with a distance
between them of d, ... Or more verbosely, given a space with a metric
M, the distance between two points a and b is M(A, b).
Yours,
Joel
On 7/7/19 10:26 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
Dear Joel,
Thank you very much for your kind review.
Nits/editorial comments:
In section 2.2, in talking about "metric M", if I have understood properly,
I think it would be clearer if you referred to "metric value M".
This section has been expanded with human-readable text and a reference to
a research paper, and should therefore now be easier to understand.
I have, however, decided to follow the usual style of mathematical
writing, and have therefore chosen not to follow your advice. I hope that
is okay.
Thanks again,
-- Juliusz
_______________________________________________
babel mailing list
ba...@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
