Agreed. On Christmas (or any other day), I am thankful this list helps move things forward in a variety of ways, for a variety of different people. I'm looking forward to hearing what Caroline would like to discuss, or Beria. But glad to know your thoughts on "pimp" and "madam" sarah, and to see a suggested path to improving wikipedia content. I do enjoy that stuff the most. Collabotative encyclopedia writing is fucking awesome, and I love how everybody goes about it a little differently.
Pete On Dec 25, 2011 11:25 AM, "Ole Palnatoke Andersen" <palnat...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Sarah Stierch <sarah.stie...@gmail.com> > wrote: > ... > > It's a shame that my posts have been so bothersome for the list, I never > > knew that I was only making things worse, or not helping at all. > > I, for one, do not find your posts bothersome. > I find no problem with having one gender-neutral article for barbers > and hairdressers or for pimps and madams, but I do find it better to > have *two* good articles on the respective subjects. > > > Regards, > Ole > > -- > http://palnatoke.org * @palnatoke * +4522934588 > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
