I'm not so sure. As soon as the incident was noted, the article was semi-protected, which solved the problem.
Perhaps you are suggesting flagged revisions for *all* biographies of living persons (BLPs), by default? -Pete On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Andreas Kolbe <jayen...@gmail.com> wrote: > This case presents a good argument for flagged revisions. Given that the > people who made these edits weren't logged in, none of their additions and > changes would have been visible to the public. > > Andreas > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:04 AM, <koltzenb...@w4w.net> wrote: >> >> Hi Gillian, >> >> thank you for this information >> >> do you have any suggesting as a positive action that members of this list >> might take, in this case as well as >> generally? >> >> open for suggestions, >> Claudia >> >> On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:33:38 +1000, Gillian White wrote >> > Hi All, >> > The Community is aware of this and is discussing it. However, it's >> > worthwhile bringing to the attention of this list that one woman's >> > efforts >> > at studying gender stereotyping (reported in The New >> > >> > Statesman<http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/internet/2012/06/dear-internet- >> > why-you-cant-have-anything-nice>) have resulted in massive and nasty >> > vandalism of Anita Sarkeesian's page on Wikipedia >> > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Sarkeesian>. >> > Gillian >> >> >> thanks & cheers, >> Claudia >> koltzenb...@w4w.net >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gendergap mailing list >> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap > _______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
