It also gives a good argument for admins actually applying semi-protection
properly.  BLPs under attack should always have a LONG semi-protection that
can be shortened if it is determined the risk is abated.  I was fairly
flabbergasted to see a very brief SP applied when it was obvious there was
a serious external campaign happening.

Risker/Anne

On 15 June 2012 15:54, Andreas Kolbe <jayen...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This case presents a good argument for flagged revisions. Given that the
> people who made these edits weren't logged in, none of their additions and
> changes would have been visible to the public.
>
> Andreas
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:04 AM, <koltzenb...@w4w.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi Gillian,
>>
>> thank you for this information
>>
>> do you have any suggesting as a positive action that members of this list
>> might take, in this case as well as
>> generally?
>>
>> open for suggestions,
>> Claudia
>>
>> On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:33:38 +1000, Gillian White wrote
>> > Hi All,
>> > The Community is aware of this and is discussing it. However, it's
>> > worthwhile bringing to the attention of this list that one woman's
>> efforts
>> > at studying gender stereotyping (reported in The New
>> > Statesman<
>> http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/internet/2012/06/dear-internet-
>> > why-you-cant-have-anything-nice>) have resulted in massive and nasty
>> > vandalism of Anita Sarkeesian's page on Wikipedia <
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Sarkeesian>.
>> > Gillian
>>
>>
>> thanks & cheers,
>> Claudia
>> koltzenb...@w4w.net
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gendergap mailing list
>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
>
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to