As a female I've been called ridiculous for having an opinion so many
times I don't even know what it means anymore :-)
But seriously, it's not like the nominator said:"I'm on the GenderGap
list and here's why I think this list would agree these articles should
be deleted... "
Don't take rejections of AfD nominations so personally...
CM
On 8/26/2012 11:50 AM, Thomas Morton wrote:
On 26 Aug 2012, at 16:36, Carol Moore DC <carolmoor...@verizon.net
<mailto:carolmoor...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Questionable just means one has questions. So it's nice, unlike the
other words which I was contrasting with questionable - not using to
describe my specific questions on specific articles in that
particular AfD list. See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Feminism/Article_alerts
But frankly I do wonder why two people on this list nominate brand
new articles related to women for deletion rather than improving them.
HOWEVER -- the specifics should be discussed at the relevant AfD
pages, so if this little dust up gets people there, goody goody!! :-)
CM
Wow. What a ridiculous way to say "yes". Ive always found you to be
switched on and relevant in the past; but looking over your
contributions to those AFDs it feels like your certain the aim is to
remove these articles because we are anti-women. And for no other reason.
This is the sort of thing that puts women off editing Wikipedia and I
am happy to call it out.
Tom
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
