Good enough for this new page patroller! From, Emily
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Sarah Stierch <sarah.stie...@gmail.com>wrote: > There are plenty! She was notable before this incident happened. She's > been covered/interviewed in *multiple secondary reliable sources*. > > -Sarah > /who always likes a challenge. > > > On 3/30/13 12:58 PM, Emily Monroe wrote: > > On the other hand, we need a secondary source that is more reliable than > Facebook or Twitter. > > From, > Emily > > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Jane Darnell <jane...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Awesome! Nice article. I think she is OK on the notability front. >> Anyone who manages to accumulate more than 4 million *science* >> followers on facebook without posting regularly on sexual subjects is >> definitely noteworthy enough for Wikipedia. Add to that this strange >> development on the swear-word gender miscommunication and you pass on >> the basis of "most bizarre gendergap content to be published in 2013". >> >> 2013/3/30, Ilona Buchem <buc...@beuth-hochschule.de>: >> > Hi Sarah, >> > >> > I am following this discussion and it's interesting to see that deciding >> > about an entry is not straight-forward even to "core insiders". I wonder >> > what criteria help decide if something or someone is "worth" an article >> > in WP. How do you decide? Or: What makes it worth it or nor? >> > >> > -Ilona >> > >> > Am 3/30/13 5:17 PM, schrieb Sarah Stierch: >> >> Oh Michael, the bearer of bad news about people who generally want to >> >> write new articles on this mailing list. >> >> >> >> Is there another article where we think this type of coverage or >> >> content could be placed? I think we could even build an article about >> >> I Fucking Love Science instead. >> >> >> >> I still question if it's officially not worth an article, I haven't >> >> researched it yet. But, at this point I'm a "pro" at making people >> >> most declare non-notable rather notable based on research. (Oh the >> >> curator in me!) >> >> >> >> -Sarah >> >> >> >> On 3/30/13 6:08 AM, Michael J. Lowrey wrote: >> >>> It's appalling and depressing; but if somebody were to write a >> >>> Wikipedia article about it, at this point, I'd say it fails >> WP:NOTNEWS. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:52 AM, Jane Darnell <jane...@gmail.com >> >>> <mailto:jane...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Did anyone see this? A popular blogger on Science (with more than >> 4 >> >>> million followers) is a woman. The woman herself, Elise Andrew, >> >>> had no >> >>> idea it was a secret, and she was "outed" when she announced her >> >>> twitter account featuring a picture of herself. Apparently the >> bias >> >>> occurred because of the swear word on her facebook page which made >> >>> readers assume she was a man. Interesting conclusion! This is a >> >>> facebook hype that deserves a WP page, no? >> >>> >> >>> article is here: >> >>> >> >>> >> http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/us-news-blog/2013/mar/20/i-love-science-woman-facbook >> >>> facebook page here: >> >>> http://www.facebook.com/IFeakingLoveScience >> >>> The TV interview with Dr. Michio Kaku on CBS morning show is here: >> >>> http://cbsn.ws/109mAEL >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Gendergap mailing list >> >>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto: >> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org> >> >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Michael J. "Orange Mike" Lowrey >> >>> >> >>> "When I get a little money I buy books; and if any is left, I buy >> >>> food and clothes." >> >>> -- Desiderius Erasmus >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Gendergap mailing list >> >>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org >> >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> *Sarah Stierch* >> >> */Museumist and open culture advocate/* >> >> >>Visit sarahstierch.com <http://sarahstierch.com><< >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Gendergap mailing list >> >> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org >> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >> > >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gendergap mailing list >> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing > listGendergap@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap > > > > -- > *Sarah Stierch* > *Museumist and open culture advocate* > >>Visit sarahstierch.com <http://sarahstierch.com><< > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap > >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
