Hi Romana, CC'ing the list into threads like this falls outside of our charter, which you can read at https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap . Please stop doing it. If you want to start a discussion thread on this issue that's fine, but please don't cross-post to threads like this.
Thanks, -Leigh, wearing my moderator hat. On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Romana Busse <romana.bu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Mr. Davies > > From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee#Members > I observe you are an "inactive" Member of this alleged committee. I > hence suspect that your email is bogus. > > Accordingly I would appreciate receiving a signed email, or even a > scanned signed email clearly given on behalf of the Arbitration > Committee listing its physical address for service of legal process. > > I am shocked by the casual and secretive approach adopted to such > concerns of child pornography, especially when it was previously made > on another website http://wikipediocracy.com, naming 2 of your users > "Sitush" and "Bishonen" using sexually colored language and referring > to child pornography on your website. This Sitush is a serial stalker > and harasser of female Wikipedia editors as your Arbcom knows well.. > > It is certainly strange that I was blocked as a sock puppet at the > instance of these same 2 users (1 of whom is your Admin) when I > brought that message to their attention. It seems Wikipedia actively > discourages reporting such sexual harassment to Admins and wipes out > all trace of it from public gaze, to the extent of terminating the > account of the person who reported me for being an alleged > sockpuppet.. > > It is even stranger that you will not disclose / specify the multiple > accounts and IPs I am accused of using as an alleged sock puppet or > why I am accused of being an India Against Corruption sockpuppet when > I have never edited any page concerned with that body. It is very > strange that Arbcom will not comply with its own policies for this. . > > It is clear that the Arbcom is covering up the actions of its > anonymous users implicated in child pornography by another website. > > I urge you to reconsider as I firmly intend to pursue this matter and > investigate all your own antecedents on your inactions.. > > On 11/19/14, Roger Davies <roger.davies.w...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Romana Busse: >> >> This is to acknowledge receipt of your emails of yesterday and today. >> >> The Arbitration Committee is unable to assist you further in this >> matter. Any further communications should be sent to: >> >> le...@wikimedia.org >> >> Roger Davies >> Arbitration Committee >> >> >> >> On 18/11/2014 15:41, Romana Busse wrote: >>> Dear Anthony (AGK) >>> >>> I'm very sorry to bother you, but could I have a timeline with respect >>> to deletion, or not, of those images ? >>> >>> With the welfare of the children in mind, I feel that the school, the >>> children's parents and the local child welfare committees, magistrates >>> and police should be properly sensitized to the incidents of that >>> day, and to ensure it cannot reoccur >>> >>> I'm sure the police and the Indian Govt Cyber Advisory Committee would >>> be interested in learning from you or NYBrad the finer points of law >>> whereby Citizendium encyclopedia decides to completely wipes out the >>> images within 12 hours but Wikipedia has not done anything till now on >>> identical complaint. >>> >>> I would also like to know by when you will publish across all >>> Wikipedia projects the complete list of accounts and IPs I have >>> allegedly used, and also if I am a sockpuppet of User:MehulWB as >>> alleged or not. This is required by your same policy WP:SOCK under >>> which was blocked. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> On 11/18/14, Romana Busse <romana.bu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> This is about a potential threat to clearly identifiable Indian minor >>>> school children whose images are retained on WMF servers in USA and >>>> India despite legal notice to remove them. >>>> Taken within their school (where their parents expected the same >>>> degree of privacy as they enjoy at home) and uploaded without their >>>> permission, consent or knowledge, at a location where they allegedly >>>> viewed grossly obscene pornography accessed on a Wikimedia Foundation >>>> service which has now been disabled on complaint by a body called >>>> [[India Against Corruption]]. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ArbCom-appeals-en mailing list >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BASC >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/arbcom-appeals-en >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap -- Leigh Honeywell http://hypatia.ca @hypatiadotca _______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
