Hi Romana,

CC'ing the list into threads like this falls outside of our charter,
which you can read at
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap . Please stop
doing it. If you want to start a discussion thread on this issue
that's fine, but please don't cross-post to threads like this.

Thanks,

-Leigh, wearing my moderator hat.

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Romana Busse <romana.bu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Mr. Davies
>
> From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee#Members
> I observe you are an "inactive" Member of this alleged committee. I
> hence suspect that your email is bogus.
>
> Accordingly I would appreciate receiving a signed email, or even a
> scanned signed email clearly given on behalf of the Arbitration
> Committee listing its physical address for service of legal process.
>
> I am shocked by the casual and secretive approach adopted to such
> concerns of child pornography, especially when it was previously made
> on another website http://wikipediocracy.com, naming 2 of your users
> "Sitush" and "Bishonen" using sexually colored language and referring
> to child pornography on your website. This Sitush is a serial stalker
> and harasser of female Wikipedia editors as your Arbcom knows well..
>
> It is certainly strange that I was blocked as a sock puppet at the
> instance of these same 2 users (1 of whom is your Admin) when I
> brought that message to their attention.  It seems Wikipedia actively
> discourages reporting such sexual harassment to Admins and wipes out
> all trace of it from public gaze, to the extent of terminating the
> account of the person who reported me for being an alleged
> sockpuppet..
>
> It is even stranger that you will not disclose / specify the multiple
> accounts and IPs I am accused of using as an alleged sock puppet or
> why I am accused of being an India Against Corruption sockpuppet when
> I have never edited any page concerned with that body. It is very
> strange that Arbcom will not comply with its own policies for this. .
>
> It is clear that the Arbcom is covering up the actions of its
> anonymous users implicated in child pornography by another website.
>
> I urge you to reconsider as I firmly intend to pursue this matter and
> investigate all your own antecedents on your inactions..
>
> On 11/19/14, Roger Davies <roger.davies.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Romana Busse:
>>
>> This is to acknowledge receipt of your emails of yesterday and today.
>>
>> The Arbitration Committee is unable to assist you further in this
>> matter. Any further communications should be sent to:
>>
>> le...@wikimedia.org
>>
>> Roger Davies
>> Arbitration Committee
>>
>>
>>
>> On 18/11/2014 15:41, Romana Busse wrote:
>>> Dear Anthony (AGK)
>>>
>>> I'm very sorry to bother you, but could I have a timeline with respect
>>> to deletion, or not, of those images ?
>>>
>>> With the welfare of the children in mind, I feel that the school, the
>>> children's parents and the local child welfare committees, magistrates
>>> and police should be properly sensitized  to the incidents of that
>>> day, and to ensure it cannot reoccur
>>>
>>> I'm sure the police and the Indian Govt Cyber Advisory Committee would
>>> be interested in learning from you or NYBrad  the finer points of law
>>> whereby Citizendium encyclopedia decides to completely wipes out the
>>> images within 12 hours but Wikipedia has not done anything till now on
>>> identical complaint.
>>>
>>> I would also like to know by when you will publish across all
>>> Wikipedia projects the complete list of accounts and IPs I have
>>> allegedly used, and also if I am a sockpuppet of User:MehulWB as
>>> alleged or not. This is required by your same policy WP:SOCK under
>>> which was blocked.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> On 11/18/14, Romana Busse <romana.bu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> This is about a potential threat to clearly identifiable Indian minor
>>>> school children whose images are retained on WMF servers in USA and
>>>> India despite legal notice to remove them.
>>>> Taken within their school (where their parents expected the same
>>>> degree of privacy as they enjoy at home) and uploaded without their
>>>> permission, consent or knowledge, at a location where they allegedly
>>>> viewed grossly obscene pornography accessed on a Wikimedia Foundation
>>>> service which has now been disabled on complaint by a body called
>>>> [[India Against Corruption]].
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ArbCom-appeals-en mailing list
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BASC
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/arbcom-appeals-en
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap



-- 
Leigh Honeywell
http://hypatia.ca
@hypatiadotca

_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to