Thank you everyone for looking out and thanks Leigh for using your
moderator powers.

-Sarah

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Leigh Honeywell <le...@hypatia.ca> wrote:

> Mod bit set.
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Please moderate or even remove access to this list.
>>
>> Risker
>>
>> On 18 November 2014 16:52, Ryan Kaldari <rkald...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, I don't see how this is at all relevant to the gender gap. Please
>>> moderate the sender.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:27 PM, George Herbert <
>>> george.herb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I was going back and forth on speaking up myself, but I concur.
>>>>
>>>> George William Herbert
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 18, 2014, at 1:21 PM, Nathan <nawr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello the moderators, I think the legal threats implied in this e-mail
>>>> (and the other) are sufficient to warrant moderating the sender.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Romana Busse <romana.bu...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Davies
>>>>>
>>>>> From
>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee#Members
>>>>> I observe you are an "inactive" Member of this alleged committee. I
>>>>> hence suspect that your email is bogus.
>>>>>
>>>>> Accordingly I would appreciate receiving a signed email, or even a
>>>>> scanned signed email clearly given on behalf of the Arbitration
>>>>> Committee listing its physical address for service of legal process.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am shocked by the casual and secretive approach adopted to such
>>>>> concerns of child pornography, especially when it was previously made
>>>>> on another website http://wikipediocracy.com, naming 2 of your users
>>>>> "Sitush" and "Bishonen" using sexually colored language and referring
>>>>> to child pornography on your website. This Sitush is a serial stalker
>>>>> and harasser of female Wikipedia editors as your Arbcom knows well..
>>>>>
>>>>> It is certainly strange that I was blocked as a sock puppet at the
>>>>> instance of these same 2 users (1 of whom is your Admin) when I
>>>>> brought that message to their attention.  It seems Wikipedia actively
>>>>> discourages reporting such sexual harassment to Admins and wipes out
>>>>> all trace of it from public gaze, to the extent of terminating the
>>>>> account of the person who reported me for being an alleged
>>>>> sockpuppet..
>>>>>
>>>>> It is even stranger that you will not disclose / specify the multiple
>>>>> accounts and IPs I am accused of using as an alleged sock puppet or
>>>>> why I am accused of being an India Against Corruption sockpuppet when
>>>>> I have never edited any page concerned with that body. It is very
>>>>> strange that Arbcom will not comply with its own policies for this. .
>>>>>
>>>>> It is clear that the Arbcom is covering up the actions of its
>>>>> anonymous users implicated in child pornography by another website.
>>>>>
>>>>> I urge you to reconsider as I firmly intend to pursue this matter and
>>>>> investigate all your own antecedents on your inactions..
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/19/14, Roger Davies <roger.davies.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Romana Busse:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > This is to acknowledge receipt of your emails of yesterday and today.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The Arbitration Committee is unable to assist you further in this
>>>>> > matter. Any further communications should be sent to:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > le...@wikimedia.org
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Roger Davies
>>>>> > Arbitration Committee
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On 18/11/2014 15:41, Romana Busse wrote:
>>>>> >> Dear Anthony (AGK)
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> I'm very sorry to bother you, but could I have a timeline with
>>>>> respect
>>>>> >> to deletion, or not, of those images ?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> With the welfare of the children in mind, I feel that the school,
>>>>> the
>>>>> >> children's parents and the local child welfare committees,
>>>>> magistrates
>>>>> >> and police should be properly sensitized  to the incidents of that
>>>>> >> day, and to ensure it cannot reoccur
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> I'm sure the police and the Indian Govt Cyber Advisory Committee
>>>>> would
>>>>> >> be interested in learning from you or NYBrad  the finer points of
>>>>> law
>>>>> >> whereby Citizendium encyclopedia decides to completely wipes out the
>>>>> >> images within 12 hours but Wikipedia has not done anything till now
>>>>> on
>>>>> >> identical complaint.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> I would also like to know by when you will publish across all
>>>>> >> Wikipedia projects the complete list of accounts and IPs I have
>>>>> >> allegedly used, and also if I am a sockpuppet of User:MehulWB as
>>>>> >> alleged or not. This is required by your same policy WP:SOCK under
>>>>> >> which was blocked.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Thanks
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On 11/18/14, Romana Busse <romana.bu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >>> This is about a potential threat to clearly identifiable Indian
>>>>> minor
>>>>> >>> school children whose images are retained on WMF servers in USA and
>>>>> >>> India despite legal notice to remove them.
>>>>> >>> Taken within their school (where their parents expected the same
>>>>> >>> degree of privacy as they enjoy at home) and uploaded without their
>>>>> >>> permission, consent or knowledge, at a location where they
>>>>> allegedly
>>>>> >>> viewed grossly obscene pornography accessed on a Wikimedia
>>>>> Foundation
>>>>> >>> service which has now been disabled on complaint by a body called
>>>>> >>> [[India Against Corruption]].
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>> >> ArbCom-appeals-en mailing list
>>>>> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BASC
>>>>> >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/arbcom-appeals-en
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Gendergap mailing list
>>>>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gendergap mailing list
>>>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gendergap mailing list
>>>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gendergap mailing list
>>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gendergap mailing list
>> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Leigh Honeywell
> http://hypatia.ca
> @hypatiadotca
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
>


-- 

Sarah Stierch

-----

Diverse and engaging consulting for your organization.

www.sarahstierch.com
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to