Anne, I do think you misinterpreted what I was suggesting and perhaps the project. The artificial intelligence tool is currently being trained using volunteers to rank messages, but once launched it would operate and only need humans for maintenance, I imagine.
-- Jackie Koerner > On Feb 12, 2017, at 5:38 PM, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On 12 February 2017 at 17:22, Jonathan Cardy <werespielchequ...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> Thanks Risker, >> >> Clearly not everyone would opt into it if there was an option to do so. Do >> you object to the idea of developing an option to opt in to email filtering? >> >> Regards >> >> Jonathan/WereSpielChequers >> >> > > Yes, I do, to be honest. The other proposals included in this discussion > would be far, far more effective in limiting unwanted or inappropriate > emails, without requiring the need to recruit and screen a large number of > volunteers to "screen out" inappropriate emails. Honestly, the idea that we'd > want people to turn their volunteer time over to screening emails rather than > doing everything else that needs to be done is kind of worrisome; current > volunteers already have a plethora of activities to participate in, many of > which can also assist in harassment reduction, and I'm not sure I'd like to > know the psychological profile of people who would volunteer specifically to > screen emails. Hiring staff to do this would be outrageous, both from the > optics perspective, and more importantly from the cost perspective; the > $500,000 grant would probably not even cover a year's worth of salaries. > > There are some truly excellent ideas on how to manage email harassment > already in this thread, most particularly those that center on the individual > users selecting with whom they wish to correspond off-wiki. I think these > have a lot of potential to provide support to our volunteers. Do keep in > mind, though, that a disproportionate number of users who have been on the > receiving end of email harassment are those who are expected to be available > via email, and for whom much email would include confidential or private > information relating to their volunteer tasks: oversighters, checkusers, > Arbcom members, and in some cases administrators. It would be inappropriate > for them to use moderated email. > > Risker/Anne > > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please > visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap