On 22 April 2018 at 11:12, Henk P. Penning <penn...@uu.nl> wrote: > On Sun, 22 Apr 2018, Jan Iversen wrote: > >> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 11:57:33 +0200 >> From: Jan Iversen <jancasacon...@gmail.com> >> To: general@attic.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Discussion on proposed solutions for simplified maintenance. > > >>> On 22 Apr 2018, at 11:33, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> For proper comparison I think we need to see the whole solution. >>> This will obviously have to be done so that it does not impact the live >>> site. >> >> I believe the sample I have made with test.html and generation of all >> project files are sufficient. No need to waste more time on that. Time >> saving is important to me, and it does not make sense to waste >> resources on making two complete solutions just to scrap one of them. > > > Right ; I think Jan's stuff is ok ; basicly it doesn't have > to be more complicated than that. It is a good starting > point for further development.
It does not (yet) handle all the existing information on Attic website. Nor does it yet keep the URLs unchanged. I think think it would be wrong to replace the existing site until that has been addressed. Which is why I think there should be a PoC that can be tested. I will create a new branch so the existing proposal can be developed further. > Personally I would separate the (json) data from the program, > but that is a minor detail. Agreed; if JSON is to be used it should be in a separate file. > Regards, > > Henk Penning > > ------------------------------------------------------------ _ > Henk P. Penning, ICT-beta R Uithof MG-403 _/ \_ > Faculty of Science, Utrecht University T +31 30 253 4106 / \_/ \ > Leuvenlaan 4, 3584CE Utrecht, NL F +31 30 253 4553 \_/ \_/ > http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~penni101/ M penn...@uu.nl \_/
