--- Dustin Puryear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To open up another avenue of discussion.. But can it > also be said that more > open source than commercial software is written by > self-trained or > hobbyists programmers? Could this result in the > average open source program > being written poorly, or at least not with the same > rigor as commercial > programs?
Sure, but nobody should expect the average open source software to work well "right out of the box", whereas it is reasonable to expect commercial software to work well, since we pay $ for it. We usually test the heck out of it before putting it in to a production environment. Or, we rely on the reputation of a specific OSS package. Agreed, there are a lot of crappy OSS and OS programmers out there, but all we can really do is point fingers and jeer. Given enough programmers|will power|time, even crappy OSS can get better. I don't think it is productive to measure OSS and commercial software by the same yardsticks. But, I don't know what the yardsticks are for OSS. > Perhaps we should take Microsoft out of the > discussion and only include all > other commercial software. It's too easy to attack > Microsoft code, and they > are certainly not the major supplier of [all] > software. Let's consider open > source vs. commercial-code-without-Microsoft to keep > the conversation on > track. And if someone brings up Microsoft I'll bring > up Sendmail as a > counter example. Good enough. John Hebert __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ ================================================ BRLUG - The Baton Rouge Linux User Group Visit http://www.brlug.net for more information. Send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to change your subscription information. ================================================
