I argee, except for SAP, and Fortran, and Unix...

Wait a minute.  I don't agree.  There is a lot of
"in-house" software that has no application outside of
a single business, but 99%  I don't see it.

You seem to be suggesting that 99 times out of a 100
that a business would prefer to write their own
software at their expense, or that given a piece of
off-the-shelf software a company would choose to alter
it 99 times out of a 100.

I agree that industry invests a lot of cash in
tweaking software for their own needs, but I have been
in projects in large corporations that built entire
manufacturing units with off-the-shelf software.

I think a more realisic value for "in-house" developed
software is down to 40 or 50 percent these days.  Even
then you would have to qualify what is modified and
what is developed.

I spent six years at Exxon-Mobile and left in 2001. 
During that time we went from about 80% "in-house"
software to about 8% "in house" software.  That 8% was
in the labs.

DSM, same story.  I would love to think that the major
corporations are still hiring and paying programmers,
but my experience has not borne that out.

I am not trying to rile you, I am just offering a
different view.  It has been close to ten years since
I had to trouble-shoot code for "in-house" software.

If you can offer hope to budding programmers, please
do.  I would love to hear they can get a job doing
something besides making X-Box trash.

Doug



--- Jim Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 99% of in-house software that I've seen addresses
> specific business needs
> within the local business environment.  I don't see
> any benefit to
> cooperating/organizing this type of software
> development.
> 
> Jim
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim
> Fournet
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 9:57 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [brlug-general] free, closed and
> practical software.
> > 
> > 

=====
Warmest Regards,

Doug Riddle
http://www.dougriddle.com
http://fossile-project.sourceforge.net/
http://www.libranet.com
-- "Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the 
Peoples' Liberty Teeth." - George Washington --


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

Reply via email to