The place to encrypt sensitive data is at the source because no network should be trusted. If LSU is worried about liability for exposing sensitive data, they need to lock down the data before they transmit it. I'm not sure how that would be more expensive then locking yourself into Cisco routers.
On Friday 02 February 2007 09:06, Dustin Puryear wrote: > I disagree. Kind of. > > Obviously, end-to-end encryption is the only way to be [mostly] > secure. Certainly. But, the last 100 feet in a wireless network is > VERY INSECURE AND VERY EASY TO INTERCEPT. The same cannot be said of > wired networks or even of most traffic on the Internet. If I had $10 > to spend on a solution, I'd rather spend it on encrypting my wireless > traffic than spend it elsewhere. Now, if I had $20, I'd encrypt > everything. :) >
