(nonbinding) +1 from me on putting the replyto to go to the list... . 

On Sun, 2002-10-20 at 16:09, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> APACHE COMMONS PROJECT STATUS:                          -*-indented-text-*-
> Last modified at [$Date: 2002/10/20 20:08:36 $]
> 
> Release:
>     none yet; still defining mission :-)
> 
> 
> Resolved Issues:
> 
>     o The Commons will be language-agnostic.
> 
>     o Projects that are "in scope" are defined as:
>     
>       - Existing components that are, or would be, useful to multiple
>         projects
> 
> 
> Pending issues:
>     o Enabling Reply-to on the @commons lists:
>       +1: aaron, coar, donaldp, geirm
>       -1: fitz, gstein, jerenkrantz, striker, jim
> 
>     o The name 'Commons' has caused some heartburn with the
>       Jakarta community because of the Jakarta-Commons project.
>       Should we rename to avoid conflicts and keep the peace?
>       Conflicts would include Java namespace as well as
>       philosophical aspects.
>       +1: 
>       +0: coar (i'm willing)
>       -0: jerenkrantz
>       -1: 
> 
>     o If we rename, to what?  What words/names describe our
>       purpose?
>       - toolbox
>       - util
>       - library
>       - suite (sweet?)
>       - belt (as in bat-belt or tool-belt)
>       - mcgiver
>       - ?
> 
> What is the project's mission?  Our statement of goals/mission/vision
> should arise from the answers to the following and other questions:
> (jim notes that defining something after the fact seems very backwards
>  and broken)
> 
>     o Should it be a parent of reusable code projects used by other
>       parts of the ASF?
>       +1: coar, donaldp (if compatible communities), gstein
>       +0: fitz, striker
>       -0: jerenkrantz, jim
> 
>     o Should commons have an sandbox component to ease infrastructure
>       burden on smaller code bases?
>       +1: coar, donaldp, jerenkrantz, gstein
>        0: aaron
>       -1: jim (the PMC is about reusability, not sandbox)
> 
>     o What types of components would be appropriate for this
>       project? ("in scope")
> 
>       - Tools that help/promote reusability?
>         Hypothetical: ant, jlibtool, ASF-based autoconf
>         +1: jerenkrantz, gstein, striker
>         -1:
> 
>       - Reusable libraries?
>         Hypothetical: serf, regexp
>         +1: jerenkrantz, gstein, striker
>         -1:
> 
>       - Development frameworks?
>         Hypothetical: avalon
>         +1:
>         -1:
> 
>       - Donations that don't cleanly fit into any other projects, but
>         do fit the goals of the commons?
>         +1: coar, jerenkrantz, fitz,
>             donaldp (if it fits the community reqs),
>             gstein (but the Incubator can claim a donation first; it
>                     only arrives here if the Incubator says it is worthy)
>         +0: striker (it either belongs in commons or it doesn't, other
>                      projects aren't relevant here, unless they are
>                      'the obvious home')
>         -1: aaron, jim (otherwise commons becomes a junk drawer)
> 
>       - Donations that don't cleanly fit into any other projects, and
>         don't fit the goals of commons?
>         +1: 
>         -0: gstein (what are the "goals of commons"?)
>         -1: coar, jerenkrantz, striker, fitz, jim
> 
>       - Donations that could fit but have a more obvious (proper) home which
>         has already rejected it?
>         +1: coar, donaldp, gstein (note the "might fit" term)
>         -0:
>         -1: jerenkrantz, jim, aaron, striker, fitz
> 
>       - Existing ASF components whose committers believe that they
>         are a better fit under commons and the commons PMC agrees?
>         (If this component were brought up as new, we would accept it.)
>         +1: coar, donaldp, jerenkrantz, striker, gstein, fitz
>         +0: aaron (we need to refine this point, but I like it in general)
>         -1: jim (by this definition httpd could be in commons)
>                 (gstein says: see the "if" part; we wouldn't accept httpd)
>                 (jim says: until we better define what the PMC would or
>                  would not accept, then this seems too wishy-washy to me)
> 
>       - Packages being worked on by Apache developers, with a clear
>         affiliation, that can't or won't be bundled?  (E.g., an
>         httpd module)
>         +1: coar, donaldp
>         -1: jerenkrantz, striker, gstein, fitz, jim
> 
> Current mission/charter as approved by the board:
> 
>     'The Apache Commons PMC hereby is responsible for the creation
>     and maintenance of software related to reusable libraries and
>     components, based on software licensed to the Foundation.'
> 
> The complete text of the resolution that was passed is:
> 
>        WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
>        interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
>        Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
>        Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
>        open-source software related to reusable libraries and
>        components, for distribution at no charge to the public.
> 
>        NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
>        Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Commons PMC", be
>        and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation;
>        and be it further
> 
>        RESOLVED, that the Apache Commons PMC be and hereby is
>        responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
>        related to reusable libraries and components, based on software
>        licensed to the Foundation; and be it further
> 
>        RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache Commons"
>        be and hereby is created, the person holding such office to
>        serve at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair
>        of the Apache Commons PMC, and to have primary responsibility
>        for management of the projects within the scope of
>        responsibility of the Apache Commons PMC; and be it further
> 
>        RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
>        hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
>        Apache Commons PMC:
> 
>               Aaron Bannert
>               Ken Coar (chair)
>               Peter Donald
>               Justin Erenkrantz
>               Brian W. Fitzpatrick
>               Jim Jagielski
>               Geir Magnusson Jr.
>               Greg Stein
>               Sander Striker
> 
>        NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Ken Coar be and
>        hereby is appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache
>        Commons, to serve in accordance with and subject to the
>        direction of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the
>        Foundation until death, resignation, retirement, removal or
>        disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be it
>        further
> 
>        RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Commons PMC be and hereby is
>        tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
>        encourage open development and increased participation in the
>        Apache Commons Project.
> 
> #
> # Local Variables:
> # mode: indented-text
> # tab-width: 4
> # indent-tabs-mode: nil
> # tab-stop-list: (4 6 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80)
> # End:
> #
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
-- 
http://www.superlinksoftware.com - software solutions for business
http://jakarta.apache.org/poi - Excel/Word/OLE 2 Compound Document in
Java                            
http://krysalis.sourceforge.net/centipede - the best build/project
structure
                    a guy/gal could have! - Make Ant simple on complex Projects!
The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to
vote.
-Ambassador Kosh

Reply via email to