On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> From: "B. W. Fitzpatrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > I dunno, but I really would prefer that we just take things and > > > evolve as we go. I'm getting awfully tired of dealing with > > > (proposed) bureaucracy. I'm so far removed from code right now, I > > > want to cry. I really do favor the 'just enough structure to keep us > > > from falling apart' in such new endeavors. > > > > I couldn't have said it any better. > > IMO, the discussion about what mailing lists to create etc. is based on an > assumption that j-c will move into a-c. Thus, since j-c committers already > know the good and bad parts of one mailing list/shared karma etc. we are > discussing whether what we currently have in j-c is optimal. That's a good point. No matter what is decided, if commons-httpclient moves in here to put it back on a shared mail list would be folly. Hen
