On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 11:53, Sander Striker wrote: > > From: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 05 November 2002 05:27 > > > On Tue, 5 Nov 2002 15:02, Scott Sanders wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 06:31:10PM -0800, Greg Stein wrote: > > > > Ooh... now I really get to do some Subversion evangelism :-) > > > > > > Does this mean commons will use Subversion instead of CVS? Are you > > > proposing this? > > > > > > +1 from me, FWIW. > > > > +1 from me too (but I can't help as I have no idea about it just yet). > > +1 on using Subversion. But hey, I'm biased ;)
I'd like to add a non-binding +1 here, which is unbiased :) I've never heard anyone who's seen subversion who didn't think it was a lot better than CVS. cheers, Leo Simons
