On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 12:46:21PM -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > Leo Simons wrote: > > > > > +1 on using Subversion. But hey, I'm biased ;) > > > > I'd like to add a non-binding +1 here, which is unbiased :) > > > > I've never heard anyone who's seen subversion who didn't think > > it was a lot better than CVS. > > i haven't used it [yet], but i'm -1 on being the first project > in the asf to go with it without some input from the infrastructure > people.
Lessee... Justin and Sander are on the infrastructure "team" and both have full commit access to SVN itself. I'll do what I can to help, but am already pretty full up. IOW, I think you've already got the input you need :-) > for instance, aside from the history import aspect, > how does it mesh with viewcvs? Pretty well, but there are more things that could be done. I expect we'll see some of that come out once the ASF starts to deploy SVN. > the equivalent of anoncvs? Even easier, as Justin pointed out. > and > do we really want to put the burden of maintaining two cms > systems on collab, The infrastrutcure guys are assuming the burden. > plus prototype all the infrastructural glue > necessary to fit in with the existing cvs repositories? Not sure what you mean. The two systems will be separate, so I'm not sure what glue will be there. > i say not. let's wait for the infrastructure team to work on > it. we can volunteer to be one of their early adopters, but > i don't think we should go it alone. They'll get it set up. Maybe put their own stuff into it first. I'd say we jump in, too :-) Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
