Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > correct. i will make two more points and then shut up. the first > is that this threading model may be standard on non-asf projects > like svn, but it is a deviation from all of the other commit notice > scenarios in apache-land.
Due to the fact that in CVS, revision numbers are per-file, and in Subversion, they're per-repository. Due to technical reasons, you *can't* do this with CVS's commit mailer. > second, i rather object to the people familiar with subversion > more-or-less forcing their opinion on the community because a) that's > what *they're* used to, b) it's what *they* prefer, and c) *they're* > the only ones who know how to change it. :-) How am I forcing my opinion on the community? I stated my preference and my reasons, and you stated your preference and your reasons. Cast it up to a vote and go with the consensus--that's the way to do it here, isn't it? It's not my fault if commons is littered with Subversion people who share my preference! :-) -Fitz -- Brian W. Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.red-bean.com/fitz/
