B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:

> Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> correct.  i will make two more points and then shut up.  the first
>> is that this threading model may be standard on non-asf projects
>> like svn, but it is a deviation from all of the other commit notice
>> scenarios in apache-land.  
> 
> Due to the fact that in CVS, revision numbers are per-file, and in
> Subversion, they're per-repository.  Due to technical reasons, you
> *can't* do this with CVS's commit mailer.

that's a piece of information i did not know.  so a particular revision
number in svn identifies a specific commit, regardless of how many
thing it touches?  if so, i withdraw my objection, which would
seem to have been made from ignorance.  my bad.
-- 
#ken    P-)}

Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Golux.Com/coar/
Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/

"Millennium hand and shrimp!"

Reply via email to