From: "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 18:09, Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > > I'm +1, but I think we should write up a true proposal/charter first. I'd > > be happy with the jakarta-commons charter with /s/Jakarta/DB, and a little > > unhappy with what seems to be the consensus guidelines for the > > apache-commons project, but if I'm in the minority I guess I could run > > with whatever the committers are willing to commit to. > > Yah, I'm happy with the jakarta guidelines too. I'm not really into the > consensus guidelines either.
+1 Incidentally I think I'd like to split up the commons-sql project into the SQL model, tools & generation stuff and a seperate dynasql project. Basically there's a DynaBean based API to access, insert, update, delete and query relational data. Its pretty simple right now but very useful. It'd be nice to give it a bit of visibility and maybe even extend it some to be as functional as the .Net DataSet stuff (which its not far off already). So having a small, focussed set of db-commons tools seems a good idea to me. James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com
