I think moving it to db-commons would be a good idea. The tricky part there may be getting a quorum of developers to bootstrap the initiative. Past proposals on db-commons have died from a complete lack of activity, but that trend is probably reversable.
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, __matthewHawthorne wrote: > Thomas Mahler wrote: > > Sounds reasonable for me! > > But I don't know if we need any special procedure for such a move. > > I also don't know if it make sense to continue it as a sepearte project > > or if it should be incorporated into the torque project for instance? > > > > any thought how to proceed? > > Well, since the code was originally in Torque, but then separated into > another project, I don't think it makes sense to put it back into > Torque. It was moved into Jakarta Commons because it contains some > generally useful functionality. But, I think it would be a better fit > in the DB Commons. > > When I asked about a special procedure, I meant where to import the code > in CVS, and also any formal proposals or anything that I need to create. > > > -- - Rod <http://radio.weblogs.com/0122027/>
