I will be happy to help get db-commons rolling, particularly as OJB is looking at some major refactoring/reworking for 1.1 and it will be good to pull out reusable components as we can.
Additionally, I have a sandbox style project I have resisted adding to jakarta-commons-sandbox as... well... that is a mess =) I may propose it to db-commons once it is off the ground in order to help start building up the libraries =) I want to see db-commons take off, and am willing to commit time to helping make that happen. -Brian On Thu, 2003-12-18 at 11:51, __matthewHawthorne wrote: > Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > > I think moving it to db-commons would be a good idea. The tricky part > > there may be getting a quorum of developers to bootstrap the initiative. > > Past proposals on db-commons have died from a complete lack of activity, > > but that trend is probably reversable. > > Before I started working on the project, I attempted to contact the > original authors to make sure it was ok. I didn't get much of a > response, Daniel Rall was the only one who gave me the green light. So, > if a move to db commons requires an active developer community, then it > may be a problem. > > However, I think that [sql] is a very good project and deserves better > than to rot away in the Jakarta Commons Sandbox. Hmm -- what would be > the best solution to this problem? Who else do I need to contact? > > >
