The semantics of this is a document in which prop* occurs at least 4  
times, where one of those times is within distance 1 of tax.
Here's the thing: index resolution of min-occurs requires positions of the  
appropriate type, and there are various cases where we can't tell in the  
indexes and leave things for the filter to decide. If you are running  
unfiltered searches, you may get false positives from index resolution.  
Look at the query plan and see if it is using the occurrence constraint.

//Mary


On Tue, 03 Apr 2018 19:37:52 -0700, Praveen Gontla  
<praveenkumargontla...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Team,
>
> Has anyone come across a query like this ? Trying to understand what  
> would
> happen in here.
>
> <cts:near-query weight="0" distance="1"> <cts:word-query weight="0">
> <cts:text xml:lang="en">prop*</cts:text>
> <cts:option>case-insensitive</cts:option>
> <cts:option>diacritic-insensitive</cts:option>
> <cts:option>punctuation-insensitive</cts:option>
> *<cts:option>min-occurs=4</cts:option>* </cts:word-query> <cts:word-query
> weight="0"> <cts:text xml:lang="en">tax</cts:text>
> <cts:option>case-insensitive</cts:option>
> <cts:option>diacritic-insensitive</cts:option>
> <cts:option>punctuation-insensitive</cts:option>
> <cts:option>unstemmed</cts:option> </cts:word-query>
> <cts:option>ordered</cts:option> </cts:near-query>
>
> When my near query contains a min-occurs option set how should it behave  
> ?
>
> I thought a document that contains prop* with in a distance of 1 for the
> term tax atleast 4 times . But the documents I get for this query are not
> like that. Even if the document has single occurrence of the term  
> property
> tax are also returned.
>
> Is my understanding correct or am I missing something in here ?
>
> Thanks,
> Praveen.


-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
General@developer.marklogic.com
Manage your subscription at: 
http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to