On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > but was (is) there a mistake by Gumpy?
No, I don't think so. > I think Gumpy was right, but are you seeing traditional acting > differently & working? "traditional" doesn't flag a build failure for projects that don't deliver the output they have promised. It helps a lot that Gumpy does this since you'd only find a wrong jar name by a missing pre-req state of another build in "traditional". Gumpy is a lot more correct here. On the other hand, if a project delivers the jars and fails after that, "traditional" Gump will use the jars while Gumpy will flag a missing pre-req. Look at jstl-jsp12 and the -13 cactus projects for an example. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
