> On Mon, 10 May 2004, Adam R. B. Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think we bite the bullet and change our id's to be artefact ids > > (changing metadata as we need). Any thoughts? > > Is there a 1:1 mapping of Maven artefacts to <jar>s?
I *beleive* so. > If so, just go ahead and change the ids - and make sure you patch all > descriptors that refer to them ;-) I'll do them one by one, as needed, looking for users as I go & changing. I found none (in our CVS) for commons-logging. > I don't think that there is any artefact id for ant-testutil.jar for > example, but that wouldn't be a problem if nobody used it. FWIIW: We create an artefact id from the jar, if we've not set the id. So we'd use ant-testutil. That said, I se your point. > Are there any cases of Maven artefact ids that don't have a > corresponding <jar> or where a single artefact is represented by > multiple jars (Ant's old optional.jar may be such a problem case). I don't know. Hopefully we'll find out via experience. :) regards Adam --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
