done.. (for both cos & jghoman). regards Ian On Jan 12, 2011, at 9:29 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Me too, please. > -- > Take care, > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik > > > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 17:18, Ian Holsman <had...@holsman.net> wrote: >> and done. >> anybody else want access? >> >> On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:12 PM, Nigel Daley wrote: >> >>> I believe ommitters can gain access following this: >>> http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson#How_do_I_get_an_account >>> Ian would have to run a command on people.apache.org. >>> >>> Nige >>> >>> On Jan 12, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote: >>> >>>> So, who has the permissions. I don't. Should I? >>>> --Konstantin >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Nigel Daley <nda...@mac.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Jakob Homan commented on HDFS-884: >>>>>> ---------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>>> Konstantin, if you're trying to kick a new patch build for this you no >>>>> longer move it to "Open" and back to "Patch Available". Instead, you must >>>>> upload a new patch. Or, if you have permission, you can kickhttps:// >>>>> hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/ and enter the issue >>>>> number. >>>>>> >>>>>> That makes me sad. Is this a new feature or regression? >>>>> >>>>> [For everyone's benefit, moving this to general@] >>>>> >>>>> Jakob, I referenced the change here: http://tinyurl.com/4crxlvy >>>>> The new system is much more robust partial because it no longer relies on >>>>> watching Jira generated emails to determined when issues move into Patch >>>>> Available state. There is limited info I can get from the Jira API, thus >>>>> the >>>>> triggering mechanism had to change. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Nige >>>>> >>> >> >>
