On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 08:25PM, Todd Papaioannou wrote: > On Mar 18, 2012, at 7:18 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > Personally, I'm for branch-3. Regardless of the potential of .22 I'd > > rather keep a slot for it. Worse case -- we don't have Hadoop 2 ever. > > Well, that would just be silly ;) The whole point of renaming releases was
Bravo! Well formulated and grown up argument at last! > to present a better face to the rest of the world. I don't think it's going > to be that fun having to try to explain why there was a Hadoop 1.0 and a > Hadoop 3.0 but Hadoop 2.0 never came out. > > ToddP > > >
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature