My vote is: 3 2 1 5 4. (binding)
Thanks, Enis On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Daryn Sharp <da...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > 3 1 4 2 5 (non-binding) > > Daryn > > > On Mar 19, 2012, at 8:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > > We've discussed several options: > > > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. > > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a > hole. > > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. > > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 > months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone > discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. > > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > > > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > > > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > > > > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > > > > The vote will run the normal 7 days. > > > > thanks, > > Arun > > > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote > > > >
