3, 2, 1, 4, 5 (non-binding)
Mark On 3/19/12 8:06 PM, "Arun C Murthy" <a...@hortonworks.com> wrote: >We've discussed several options: > >(1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. >(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a >hole. >(3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. >(4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 >months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone >discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. >(5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. > >Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. > >Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. > >My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). > >The vote will run the normal 7 days. > >thanks, >Arun > >[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >
