On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > You can call it the "anti-big-company" rule. > > Diversity is good on the grounds that (a) no one company can control the > direction of an ASF project, and (b) the fate of one company doesn't dictate > the fate of the project.
But also that the fate of the company doesn't depend on the fate of the project. I can envision a company using this mechanism to get free labor for their project, and then going under when the project doesn't do so great. This would be a great shame, and would reflect rather badly on everyone. -- Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] There's more than one way to eat a rhesus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
