On Dec 2, 2003, at 5:40 PM, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 09:58:02AM +0100, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:IMNSHO Geronimo can easily go on without a logo or a final name for a
couple of weeks if needed, so I'll wait to get 3 done after 1 and 2 are
done.
Please don't postpone this any longer.
Right - lets get the PPMC setup and have *them* deal with it.
We have had a vote.
Which of these are binding votes? ;)
I would like to hear what the current Geronimo committers think about the vote, and if they are ok with selecting a new name (or if they are vehemently opposed to choosing a new name). I realize that a discussion about the name has already occured within the committers, but I don't know if that decision was unanimous. Can we get the committers to vote/voice their opinion here so we can finally wrap this up?
They would in the PPMC. If you feel that it would be valid to have the committers decide - something I'm really glad to see - lets use this as a motivation to get the PPMC structure setup, get a mail list for them, and watch them go.
Given that PPMC decisions are subject to PMC and board oversight, there's no risk in doing it this way.
geir
-- Geir Magnusson Jr 203-247-1713(m) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
