Sanjiva, Please hang on for my next email :)
-- dims On 2/17/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 11:42 -0800, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > > > One thing that should be resolved as soon as possible is how we will > > bring in new members. At the moment there are 17 proposed new > > committers for a total of 37 committers. I think that this list might > > rival that of Geronimo in terms of size; it seems excessive. I propose > > that people are brought in using the standard method of submitting patches. > > -1 .. given that only a handful of the 37 committers (from Sybase and > Intalio) have touched that code, I see one of two possible paths: > > - start with *just* those people as committers > - start with everyone who wants to be a committer at this stage as > committers > > The latter has been the traditional starting point for incubating > projects. What you're proposing is some weird middlepoint which biases > towards the few who signed up in the first few days/whatever. IMO that's > not a good model! > > Sanjiva. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]