Ok, it was worth a shot. I've been stewing over possible name selections for a couple days and can't seem to come up with any strong possibilities.
- James Martin Cooper wrote: > On 5/24/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Does any one have any problems with simply calling this project >> "Atom"... as in, "The Apache Atom Implementation" ? > > > Well, unless I'm mistaken, it would actually be (at least) the second Atom > implementation at the ASF, since Roller has one already. Simply calling it > Atom implies it has some special status, especially in the phrase you use > above (i.e. "The Apache Atom Implementation"). So I would not be in favour > of that name. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
