On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 09:04:27PM -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: > On 6/21/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On 6/21/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Yah, I guess so. But, then follow the rest of the stuff on the new > >> > committers page that Jean sent out. -- justin > >> > >> thanks justin. > > > >sorry justin, for bothering you again... > > > >Or should we create a "adffaces-ppmc" list for the adf faces incubation?
What do you *want* to do? What makes most sense? > We didn't have one for the WebWork incubation, which I think is similar to > the situation you are in with ADFFaces. We also didn't get clear direction > on what we were supposed to do don't you love it when delegation actually works :) > , so we just used the Struts PMC + initial > committers as an informal PPMC to vote on bringing in new committers. That seems fine (especially if it worked well!) I think this is one such example where there is no good "one size fits all" answer. Eg, if you have lots of "informal PPMC" stuff to do, there's always the option of setting up a mailing list :) What's important is that a PMC at some point is involved in the decision (infra@ wants account requests coming on behalf of a PMC) and that the actual "project community" (which seems to usually not be 1-1 with any PMC in case of incubation) is happy with the decision process. (disclaimer: there are lots of important things :) ) LSD --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
