Trustin Lee wrote: > > > It makes total sense. I'd love to see everything becomes real, though we > need to draw a line between generalization and specialization when we > generalize AsyncWeb because MINA already has its role to provide a generic > network application framework. >
Absolutely. There are many cases, for example, where a feature for asyncweb would be best implemented in MINA and then simply delegated to by asyncweb (For example, Im thinking of things like direct file -> channel transfers etc). Im very much looking forward to helping out with adding such features to Mina :o) Trustin Lee wrote: > > > Yes, that's my point. We will see as we integrate. I believe this is the > Apache way a community grows up healthy, sound and sustainable, like a > bottle of great wine. > :o) Dave -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-pre-proposal--AsyncWeb-tf1931092.html#a5361214 Sent from the Apache Incubator - General forum at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
