Hi, On 8/15/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think that we should consider the Jini standard separately - we have a community and a codebase, and should proceed with that now. Because it still is a standard we can work on that in parallel if all parties are willing.
+1
I believe therefore that we have now returned to the original question... what should the name of the new podling be called? :)
I think "Apache Jinn" and "Apache Genie" have already been proposed. Other alternatives could be "Apache Jafar" or "Apache Jasmine" based on characters from the Disney film featuring the famous genie. (Though I'm quite sure that "Jafar" and "Jasmine" are trademarked by Disney. Is that a problem for us?) "Apache Aladdin" would also be nice, but "Aladdin" is already heavily used. Would the Jini community be happy with bringing the project in under a different name? At some point it was mentioned that keeping the "Jini" name would be the preferred choice. I'd like to advocate using a different name also from the point of view that there is currently no exact definition of "Jini", and starting "Apache Jini" would just add to that confusion. Are there any other open issues regarding the proposal? BR, Jukka Zitting -- Yukatan - http://yukatan.fi/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software craftsmanship, JCR consulting, and Java development --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
