On Sep 19, 2006, at 5:32 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 9/19/06, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
you're right. Others have noted that our opening paragraphs are not
very clear. We did however follow up with more explanation that
satisfied others on the list. Are you saying that these further
explanations are still not clear, or that those explanations
should go
into the proposal itself (as opposed to a link from the Wiki)?
Yes, those explanations should be folded into the proposal itself.
UIMA may not be the easiest thing in the world to explain, and I can
accept that our proposal doesn't do a very good job. However, I do
believe that we address an important problem and can make an
interesting
contribution to Apache. Making the first couple of paragraphs of the
proposal more understandable should be a surmountable problem.
I hope so. =) -- justin
I'll delay a vote until you guys finish up the proposal based on the
mailing list discussion there was (Robert's new document might help
to further understand why that's important). I did make a mental note
(quite some time ago!) that I was basically +1 to this UIMA thing
after I was explained what it was in normal English.
LSD
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
