I've done another pass on the LICENSE file to hopefully address this
problem, but I'm not really sure that I understood exactly what it
needs to look like, so feedback on this would be great.
The updated LICENSE and NOTICE files are available here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ofbiz/trunk/LICENSE
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ofbiz/trunk/NOTICE
Thanks,
-David
On Sep 25, 2006, at 6:04 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 9/25/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There's one important gotcha:
-> the NOTICE file has information on the licenses of various third
party jars, which in some cases are not a subset of ALv2, even if
compatible. I believe that info should go into the LICENSE file; but
can't find an authortive reference on our website right now. Cliff,
Robert? This is important because the notice file cannot modify the
terms of the LICENSE that are supposed to apply to the work as a
whole, whereas obviously a LICENSE file can modify LICENSE terms.
That is correct. LICENSE should be the collection of all licenses
that file is under. See:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/LICENSE
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/NOTICE
HTH. -- justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
