Sam Ruby wrote: >> I understand it is good practice to restart a vote if the vote thread >> becomes heavy with discussion. This is the case with the vote that was >> begun at >> http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg11201.html >> which contains some issues raised and comments to address each of those >> issues. >> >> So please vote to ratify the Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2 >> artifacts at http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/RC5a/ which >> have been voted for by the Tuscany PPMC. >> >> Vote thread:* >> http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg09797.html >> Result thread: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg10046.html >> >> Kind Regards, Kelvin. > > +1 > > Furthermore, I challenge all the other Incubator PMC members who have > yet to vote to follow through on their responsibilities as a member of > this PMC. > > I am firmly of the belief that the Incubator is exhibiting all the > negative aspects that are associated with a umbrella PMC. I will start > a separate thread on this.
uh, I didn't even know I was still part of the incubator PMC, I've not been subscribed to any of the incubator lists for a long time. So, in case I have to make it official, I resign from my PMC position. Thank you. -- Stefano. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
