I'm new to this judging releases game, so I apologise if I'm missing the
mark, but...
If ActuveMQ is incubating, shouldn't the filename of the release reflect
that?
Upayavira
James Strachan wrote:
+1
On 11/16/06, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 though I'd consider making the configure script +x in the future.
-Brian
On Nov 14, 2006, at 6:30 PM, Nathan Mittler wrote:
> The ActiveMQ community has voted on the release of ActiveMQ CPP 1.0
> with a
> total of 6 +1's.
>
> The source bundle for the release candidate can be found here:
> http://people.apache.org/~tabish/activemq-cpp-1.0.zip
>
> And here's the wiki page for the release:
> http://www.activemq.org/site/activemq-cpp-10-release.html
>
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [ ] +1 Release the source as Apache ActiveMQ CPP 1.0
> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments)
>
> Regards,
> Nate
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
