On Apr 24, 2007, at 12:46 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 24/04/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to
> enterprise application and remoting services, for distribution at
> no charge to the public.
A bit generic for a project that is intended to managing an
implementation
of a well-defined specification?
I think it's accurate - it doesn't implement the entire EJB spec
(using other components such as OpenJPA to do so), and it would be in
scope to do additional, non-EJB things that make it better at the
purpose stated here.
We could use "Scalable, transactional, and multi-user secure
architecture for the development and deployment of component-based
business applications", but that'd be plagiarism as that's a
minimally paraphrased version the definition of EJB in the JSR.
Generally, I think it's good to use words that describe EJB then the
words Enterprise JavaBeans specifically. Primarily because I think
it's good to be able to innovate in the space and not limit ourselves
to the ideas approved by the EJB JSR Expert Group.
-David
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
