David Blevins wrote:
Couldn't that be "in EJB and related technologies" ??
Certainly implementing the EJB spec is a constant for the project, so
that description would be adequate. It does give me an "ick" feeling
though as it's very much in the nature of the project to go beyond EJB
and test the limits of what it means to write enterprise applications in
any way we can possibly imagine. It just seems summing that up as "and
related technologies" just doesn't capture that spirit. It'd definitely
be our preference to be able to portray ourselves as more than just EJB.
+1 for keeping that room, but in that case maybe come up with a better
name than OpenEJB? The name is clearly designed to imply certain
functionality.
Sanjiva.
--
Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
Founder & Director; Lanka Software Foundation; http://www.opensource.lk/
Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/
Director; Open Source Initiative; http://www.opensource.org/
Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
