On 7/16/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a second alpha release of Ivy. The vote email thread is available here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01175.html< http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00685.html> In summary we have 4 +1 votes from PPMC members, and no 0s or -1s. We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release this version. The candidate distribution is available, together with KEYS used to sign the release here: <http://people.apache.org/%7Exavier/ivy/staging/2.0.0-alpha-1-incubating/> http://people.apache.org/~xavier/ivy/staging/2.0.0-alpha2-incubating/< http://people.apache.org/%7Exavier/ivy/staging/2.0.0-alpha2-incubating/>< http://people.apache.org/%7Exavier/ivy/staging/2.0.0-alpha-1-incubating/> The build is based on: < https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ivy/core/branches/2.0.0-alpha-1/ > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ivy/core/branches/2.0.0-alpha2/ < https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ivy/core/branches/2.0.0-alpha-1/ > Cheers, Xavier -- Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant http://xhab.blogspot.com/ http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/ http://www.xoocode.org/
+1, looks ok to me. There's one missing license header in the src distro on IvyTaskTest.java, and I think its now preferred to include all licenses in the one LICENSE file instead of having the separate LICENSE.jquery and LICENSE.jsch files, but neither of those things are blockers. ...ant
